Posted: Thu, 2005-06-02 10:43
My opinion is that, kuld has made a very very great site "disneyland-after-dark.com" and it looks better than d-a-d.com......
What do you say to this?
Posted: Thu, 2005-06-02 11:19
Arh! Take it easy man ..
You little apple polisher
Posted: Thu, 2005-06-02 11:23
I think the design of kuld's site looks nice, but I still like this one better
Posted: Thu, 2005-06-02 11:25
Yeah me too .. The toilet-design, and all that.. It's so amazing!
Posted: Thu, 2005-06-02 12:36
hehe... i am total agree with Crappe and LucyInTheSky. This site is very cool
and at the time I dont have the skills, and the time to make a big website (I maby got the grapic skills, but that isn't enough to make a website) but in the future, it could be an idear
Posted: Thu, 2005-06-02 15:17
First of all, my compliments to kuld for his design, but I'll still vote for this page. At the moment it works very well (except the "edit" function ;) )
Posted: Thu, 2005-06-02 17:16
Yeah, the 'edit' function SUX
Posted: Thu, 2005-06-02 19:58
Excuse me, what?!?
Kuld's site looks nice and all, but what does it have to offer that isn't taken directly from this page? As far as I see it, Kuld's site is gonna be a d-a-d.com version 2, but without a lot of cool features this site has.
I'd say this site is infinitely superior to Kuld's. In design as well.
But let's wait and see how Kuld's site turns out before passing final judgment.
Posted: Sat, 2005-06-04 00:04
Kuld- You have made the side great! cool ;D
Posted: Sun, 2005-06-05 15:28
I think that's the problem with most fansites.. There aren't really atlot of new info to find on them..
Me and Tousg used to have a site "Bad Crazinet" http://www.martintousig.dk/badcrazinet_ex.htm where you could find pics of Molly through time, list of bootlegs, awards they've won, stage effects from tours ect. Well alot of stuff, you can't find on the official site..
I hope someone can/will use some of our ideas..
Posted: Sun, 2005-06-05 19:12